CRISIS OF SCIENCES AND PHENOMENOLOGY: OVERCOMING OR RADICALIZATION?

In his late works Husserl interprets the crisis of European sciences as loss their meaning for life. The diagnosis seems to suggest therapeutic strategy: overcome crisis, phenomenology must return evidences life-world. article argues that husserlian strategy overcoming consists not in elimination break with prescientific natural attitude, but, on contrary, radicalization breach. Thus, I want show seeks by means more radical phenomenology. Husserl’s view, become only science, which does presuppose life-world, since it problematizes it. am going argue also, counterintuitive is just historico-philosophical interest, but meaningful actual philosophical understanding To justify those claims, will proceed three stages. first section article, analyze difference between objective world and point departure interpretation Crisis. Bringing into correlation life-world Crisis distinction ideal real one Ideas I, disclose ambiguity sciences. According Husserl, arises, when science transcends through idealizations, and, at same time, presupposes immediate something taken granted. second section, based phenomenological epoche, allows porblematization without presupposing it, Within this context demonstrate motivational unity two reductions, performed Crisis—the reduction stripping reality garb ideas mistakingly be itself, turning horizon depriving phenomenologist a right relying life-worldly evidences, granted renders possible. reductions indicates descent back down treated third discusses question, whether problematical character can revealed from view disinterested spectator, or discovered, way, within, pretheoretical experience, capacitates life problematizing itself motivates epoche. that, although question answered suitable way within analyses motivation key solution problem provided genetic phenomenology, thematizes historicity interpret ambivalent constituting both self-evidence